• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • National News & PR Wire

National Business Journal

Ad example

Property Tax Rebellion: Fighting for Justice

February 1, 2013 by Lyle E Brennan

Lyle BrennanThe tax revolt at Lake Tahoe has reached the 10-year mark, with no end in sight. The Village League to Save Incline Assets was formed in December 2002 by a small group of Incline Village and Crystal Bay property owners to protest outrageously high property tax increases. This small group of determined taxpayers has been fighting Washoe County and the State Board of Equalization ever since. Even though they have won six cases in the Nevada Supreme Court, they have only achieved partial victory in their David-and-Goliath battle.

The Nevada Constitution requires “a uniform and equal rate of assessment and taxation,” but property tax assessments have been anything but equal for people living close to the lake; and now, for many property owners located throughout the state. Because the state had not provided uniform guidelines for determining property values, like other counties in the state, Washoe County had developed its own system for rating Tahoe parcels, including such intangibles as the view of the lake. For example, Mary Ingemanson, the president of the League, said she was assessed $80,000 a year in property taxes by Washoe County, while a similar property with the same lake frontage and a larger and newer home was assessed $18,000 by Douglas County.

After numerous battles with the county that escalated into the courts, Washoe County re-assessed the properties in 2006. The assessor went back to the beginning of the protest, estimating how much the properties should have been assessed for those tax years. The county now had a starting point so it could roll back the tax assessments. But after all these years and several court rulings against it, Washoe County is still fighting to keep the taxpayers’ money.

In July 2011, the Nevada Supreme Court ruled that the county had used unconstitutional property assessment methods starting in 2002. The justices tossed out the Washoe County system and ordered the county to issue refunds to 8,700 property tax payers for the 2006 tax year forward. But what was once a $100,000 debt had ballooned to more than $43 million due to the wonders of compound interest. About 70 percent of residents have received their refunds, and the rest should be paid by August.

But the group is still fighting to get refunds for tax years 2003, 2004 and 2005, which should total around $20 million with accrued interest. Interest is still mounting, costing Washoe County thousands of dollars a day for its delaying tactics. The Nevada Supreme Court ruled in favor of some individual taxpayers, who received refunds, and later affirmed that their ruling applied to all the taxpayers who owned lakeshore property in Washoe County, but most of them are still waiting for their money.

In February 2012 another Supreme Court ruling required the State Board of Equalization to hold public hearings on creating a uniform way for all counties to assess property values. The justices blamed the state, not the county, for the Lake Tahoe mess, saying the state hadn’t performed its duty of ensuring that county assessors value properties using similar standards.

The State Board held two hearings last fall. In the first one, after hearing the taxpayers’ side of the story, the board agreed unanimously that the Washoe County assessments from 2003 to 2005 were incorrect. But as soon as word got out about the board’s decision, political pressure must have been brought to bear, because at the next hearing in November, the board reversed itself. It ordered the county assessor to go back and estimate what the value of each property would have been 10 years ago. Even though they had already done a re-assessment in 2006, this allowed the county to stall for another 6 to 12 months. Another meeting of the State Board of Equalization is scheduled for this month. Will the board do its constitutional duty this time and finally grant justice to the Village League?

The injustice of the Tahoe owners is indicative of the property tax system statewide. A fair equitable and reasonable solution must be instituted post haste or assessors throughout Nevada will waste even more taxpayer dollars defending the indefensible.

For a 31-page history of this epic battle, visit NevadaPropertyTaxRevolt.org.

Filed Under: Commentary Tagged With: Crystal Bay, Douglas County, Incline Village, Mary Ingemanson, Nevada Constitution, Nevada Supreme Court, State Board of Equalization, tax revolt at Lake Tahoe, Village League to Save Incline Assets, Washoe County

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Kevin B Parsons says

    February 8, 2013 at 5:05 am

    As the government struggles to gather as much cash as possible to balance their budget,(rather than cut spending), I fear there will be many more abuses of taxpayers. And the court system is expensive, bloated and slow, making it difficult for a citizen to stand up for his rights.

Primary Sidebar

More to See

Property Rights Are Economic Rights

January 1, 2026 By Lyle E Brennan

Socialism

December 4, 2025 By Lyle E Brennan

Tags

Adam Laxalt Carson City Christianity Clark County Clark County Education Association Clark County School District Clark County School District (CCSD) Constitution coronavirus COVID-19 Governor Brian Sandoval Governor Sandoval Harry Reid Las Vegas business Las Vegas education Las Vegas real estate Lyle Brennan Marco Rubio Medicare Michael Roberson Nancy Pelosi Nevada business Nevada Constitution Nevada economy Nevada education Nevada government Nevada Legislature Nevada Policy Research Institute Nevada Policy Research Institute (NPRI) Nevada politics Nevada Supreme Court NV Energy Obama administration Obamacare Occupy Wall Street politics President Obama Reno business Reno education Solyndra State of the Union address Steve Sisolak Supreme Court Tea Party U.S. Constitution

Footer

Text Widget

This is an example of a text widget which can be used to describe a particular service. You can also use other widgets in this location.

Examples of widgets that can be placed here in the footer are a calendar, latest tweets, recent comments, recent posts, search form, tag cloud or more.

Sample Link.

Recent

  • America’s Crisis: Why Nevada Supports Texas’ Border Stand
  • The Illusion of Truth Does Real Truth Exist?
  • Cultural Marxism in Business: And Its Consequences
  • Nevada and the Nation
  • Property Rights Are Economic Rights

Search

Tags

Adam Laxalt Carson City Christianity Clark County Clark County Education Association Clark County School District Clark County School District (CCSD) Constitution coronavirus COVID-19 Governor Brian Sandoval Governor Sandoval Harry Reid Las Vegas business Las Vegas education Las Vegas real estate Lyle Brennan Marco Rubio Medicare Michael Roberson Nancy Pelosi Nevada business Nevada Constitution Nevada economy Nevada education Nevada government Nevada Legislature Nevada Policy Research Institute Nevada Policy Research Institute (NPRI) Nevada politics Nevada Supreme Court NV Energy Obama administration Obamacare Occupy Wall Street politics President Obama Reno business Reno education Solyndra State of the Union address Steve Sisolak Supreme Court Tea Party U.S. Constitution

Copyright © 2026 · Magazine Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in